Continuous core body temperature (CCBT) is an information-rich signal with circadian, infradian, and ultradian rhythms superimposed by dynamic events . Circadian rhythms are self-sustained endogenous rhythms that have approximately 24-hour periods, while infradian rhythms are endogenous rhythms with longer than 24-hour periods; the menstrual cycle is the best known example. In contrast, ultradian rhythms are endogenous cycles with a period shorter than a day. Measurement and analysis of CCBT can provide insight into reproductive health through and beyond menopause. Work carried out more than 20 years ago provided detailed information regarding circadian changes in CCBT that occur across the menstrual cycle in women [2, 3]. It was shown that the effects of hormones on circadian patterns and rhythms were so robust that the pattern was easily quantifiable in ambulatory women who were not subjected to controlled lighting, sleep/wake patterns, or activity . This analysis also indicated that assessment of CCBT would be useful for prediction of a “fertility window” for women attempting to become pregnant.
This paper reviews biologic pathways that establish and influence CCBT with a focus on effects of hormones related to the female reproductive cycle. It also reviews use of CCBT to predict fertility and technologies that have been developed to facilitate its monitoring.
Circadian clocks are found in the vast majority of life forms on Earth and appear to be a ubiquitous adaptation to allow anticipation of predictable environmental changes in sun exposure . Prominent daily rhythms in behavior, physiology, biochemistry, and gene expression are all reflections of organisms’ ability to “keep and tell time”  to align with environmental rhythms of day and night. It has been suggested that such clocks may provide advantages with respect to many activities, including avoidance of predation and finding mates and food [5, 6].
Circadian oscillators are present in individual cells and are generated by a set of genes forming a transcriptional autoregulatory feedback loop. In mammals, these “clock genes” include Clock, Bmal1, Per1, Per2, Cry1, and Cry2. Other candidate genes have also been identified and have been shown to play additional roles in the circadian gene network . Cellular clocks dictate rhythms of approximately 24 hours for many physiological processes including metabolism, division, and death [8, 9]. Every circadian clock has the following three characteristics: 1) they oscillate with a period that is close to, but not exactly, 24 hours in duration, so that the clock must be “reset” every day; 2) while chemical reactions run faster as they get hotter, the molecular machinery driving circadian oscillations is buffered against this change so that the clocks run at roughly the same rate across a wide range of environmental temperatures (note this does not preclude using daily temperature changes as a timing cue); and 3) the rhythm will entrain to a rhythmic signal capable of entraining circadian clocks referred to as a zeitgeber .
Early work on mammalian rhythms indicated that the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) was the dominant circadian pacemaker . This nucleus is composed of approximately 20,000 neurons, each of which is thought to contain a cell autonomous circadian oscillator [7, 12]. When dispersed in culture, individual SCN neurons can maintain cell-autonomous circadian cycles of spontaneous firing. However, these autonomous rhythms vary substantially from cell to cell. When SCN circuit connectivity is preserved in slice preparations, neuronal firing is tightly synchronized .
The circadian oscillators in the SCN differ from those in other organs in two important ways. First, they receive light input from the eye via retinal ganglion cells that send axons into the retinal–hypothalamic tract. This input is the primary zeitgeber for the circadian pattern of neuronal activity in the SCN [13, 14]. The second characteristic of SCN neurons which differentiates them from other cellular oscillators is that their firing pattern, when normal interconnections are intact, is temperature insensitive  (though this appears dependent on network-level buffering – see ). Other peripheral oscillators are sensitive to the phase-shifting effects of temperature and can be entrained strongly by low amplitude temperature cycles [15, 17].
The light-entrained SCN sends signals to light-insensitive peripheral clocks and synchronizes rhythms across organ systems. Results from multiple studies have shown that both humoral and non-humoral pathways are important for SCN synchronization [18, 19]. Though less well studied, there are also feedback loops linking peripheral organs back to the SCN [1, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26]). Overall, organization of the circadian system requires autonomic innervation of peripheral tissues, endocrine signaling, temperature sensing, and local signals .
The circadian rhythm of CBT is a well-documented physiological phenomenon . One of the hallmarks of the body’s circadian processes, including cycles in CBT, is that they are not generally disturbed by large temperature changes . This is due to homeostatic control over CBT exerted by a hierarchically organized set of neuronal mechanisms located in the hypothalamus . The anterior hypothalamic and preoptic areas are the primary sources of neural modulation of CBT. These portions of the hypothalamus receive input from both central and peripheral thermoreceptors and from the SCN [27, 28]. Two components are essential for their operation: 1) peripheral oscillators in organs other than the brain sensitive to subtle variations in temperature within the physiologic range; and 2) the SCN itself must be resistant to subtle temperature changes or it would be susceptible to feedback that could interfere with entrainment . The insensitivity of the SCN to variations in temperature was demonstrated in studies carried out by Brown et al who also showed that changes in ambient temperature can shift the phase of rhythms in other parts of the brain . The actions of this system result in human diurnal temperature rhythms that typically have a variation of only 1°C (36–37°C) despite large ambient temperature variations . This tight homeostatic regulation is achieved via SCN-driven feedback mechanisms controlling heat production (e.g., via brown adipose tissue and shivering thermogenesis) and loss (e.g., via vasoconstriction and dilation, sweating, and resulting evaporation and cooling) .
The above-described mechanisms result in a circadian pattern in which CBT falls late in the activity phase and starts to rise before the onset of the daily activity phase that is highly dependent on both internal zeitgebers, external zeitgebers, and genome-dependent chronotype. Along with the timing of food intake, social interaction, and locomotor activity, internal temperature is one of the most important internal zeitgebers (second-order signals) capable of synchronizing different body clocks . CBT pattern is a reliable signal when compared to melatonin and cortisol production . When measured continuously, the core temperature pattern is an accurate biomarker for circadian phase .
Endogenous circadian rhythmicity in humans tends to cycle across a period of 24.2 hours with little day-to-day variation . The timing of the circadian system, however, varies considerably across individuals. Chronotype, or diurnal preference, refers to behavioral manifestations of the endogenous circadian system that govern preferred timing of sleep and waking [34, 35]. Variations in normal patterns of circadian rhythms are linked to disease development and chronotypes have received attention across a wide range of illnesses . Chronotypes have a genetic basis and genome-wide association studies have identified multiple genes consistently associated with individual circadian rhythms [35, 36].
Reproductive function is a prime example of physiologic coordination and is under strict circadian control [39, 40]. In women with normal reproductive function, the diurnal temperature pattern for CBT is strongly influenced by the menstrual cycle of reproductive hormones, primarily estradiol and progesterone. The superimposed effect of reproductive hormone on circadian rhythm that reflects the infradian CBT pattern of the female reproductive cycle illustrated in Figure 1. In the preovulatory portion of the follicular phase there is a downward shift of the temperature mesor associated with an increase in estradiol. This is followed by the upward shift of the temperature mesor as well as a phase shift in temperature related to the rise in progesterone in the luteal phase that may be ratio dependent with respect to its effect on thermoregulation [2, 3, 41, 42].
There is clear evidence of synchronization between the infradian menstrual cycle and the circadian rhythm in reproduction in women. For example, the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge generally occurs immediately prior to the start of the day, while the onset of parturition generally occurs around 2 am to 6 am as a result of the circadian secretion of the pineal hormone – melatonin [41, 42, 43, 44]. Regular, normal length (21–35 days) menstrual cycles are considered a vital sign representing women’s wellness [45, 46]. Irregularities in cycle length, such as inadequate luteal phase, are thought to be related to infertility and, potentially, early term miscarriage . Thyroid disease and hyperprolactinemia are causes of infertility that are associated with an inadequate luteal phase . Irregular menstrual cycles, a hallmark of polycystic ovary syndrome, have been associated with higher androgen and lower sex hormone binding globulin levels. This abnormal hormonal environment may also increase the risk of specific histologic subtypes of ovarian cancer .
Disruption of circadian rhythms due to night shift work or jet lag has been associated with an increased frequency of irregular, extended menstrual cycles, alterations in serum LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels, and overall reduced fecundity [49, 50, 51]. Polymorphisms in genes that control circadian rhythm have also been associated with the rate of pregnancy loss and risk for miscarriage .
The sinusoidal oscillations in CCBT can be mathematically described on the basis of amplitude, mesor, and period. Using CBT, Cagnacci et al, characterized the follicular phase by a 0.3 °C lower mesor, a 40% increase in the amplitude and a 90-minute advance in the daily nadir compared to the luteal phase . Signal processing analysis of CCBT data has been demonstrated to be effective for detecting and predicting physiologic events of fertility, including ovulation, pregnancy, parturition, and spontaneous abortions [54, 55, 56, 57].
As noted in the Introduction, the predictive value of the information contained in the infradian pattern of body temperature in women was clearly demonstrated by results from studies reported by Coyne et al 20 years ago . These investigators carried out a detailed investigation of circadian changes in body temperature occurring across the menstrual cycle in women. Sensors were ingested to accurately monitor CBT once per minute. After calculation of the mesors for circadian temperatures during different parts of the menstrual cycle, it was observed that the circadian mesor for core body temperature is highest in the luteal phase and lowest in the preovulatory phase. The amplitude of circadian temperature was significantly reduced in the luteal phase compared to all times in the menstrual cycle. The effects of hormones on the circadian pattern and rhythm for body temperatures were readily apparent and easily quantifiable in ambulatory women who were not subjected to controlled lighting, sleep/wake patterns, or activity. Coyne et al noted that their observations supported documenting the preovulatory rise in estrogens via a decline in CBT, which would in turn provide an opportunity to investigate phenomena that might be occurring during this critical time in the cycle .
Pregnancy was shown to cause a change in the pattern of body temperature rhythms in 1948 , and has since then been remarkably unvisited. Smarr used CCBT frequency analysis for pregnancy detection in mice within 14 hours of pairing, providing the earliest, non-disruptive detection of successful impregnation . This approach was also able to detect apparent pregnancies that did not come to term, which would otherwise not be identified by standard handling or observation, providing a potential source of dams for the study of implantation failure, pseudopregnancy, and miscarriage. Such pregnancies could be separated from those that came to term by frequency analysis of CCBT in the first 12 hours after the day pairing with high accuracy. These findings support the conclusion that the continuous high temporal resolution of CCBT can provide a uniquely rapid, accurate, and non-disruptive means of detecting pregnancies and pregnancy outcomes in experimental animals .
The biphasic basal body temperature (BBT) rhythm during the menstrual cycle reaches its lowest point in a given cycle around the woman’s fertile window, just prior to ovulation, which is correlated with a pre-ovulatory peak in estrogens level illustrated in Figure 1 . Changes in the level of estrogens, as well as progesterone, influence body temperature via a direct action on thermosensitive neurons of the preoptic anterior hypothalamus [61, 62]. Estrogens lead to inhibition of mechanisms that act to retain heat and stimulation of those that promote heat loss. Thus, elevations in estrogens result in a reduction in body temperature [63, 64]. Progesterone has opposing effect and the rise in this hormone post-ovulation increases body temperature [64, 65]. The thermogenic effect of progesterone to raise core temperature has been utilized to document ovulation and luteal phase length [66, 67].
Silent anovulation is a significant underreported problem. It is defined as sporadic anovulation in women with regular menses and has a prevalence up to 37% in community-based cohorts . This is especially relevant for clinical care as the current methods used for monitoring menstrual cycles are widely believed to be inconvenient and cumbersome. The prevalence of silent anovulation in more than one-third of clinically normal menstrual cycles represents a major knowledge gap for improving understanding of women’s reproductive physiology . Monophasic patterns that lack the thermogenic effect of progesterone suggest anovulation as opposed to the biphasic pattern that confirms ovulation . It is increasingly evident that silent anovulation within clinically normal menstrual cycles is relevant for women’s health as well as for fertility. Prior et al have shown that subclinical ovulatory disturbances are associated with annual increased spinal bone loss. . Ovulatory disturbances are also related to women’s risks for later-life heart disease and likely also to breast and endometrial cancer risks [69, 70, 71].
The ability to detect fertility has become increasingly important due to changing approaches to family planning. As women delay childbearing, couples may have an increased sense of urgency when starting a family. In addition, increased exposure to disruptive environmental elements, such as high calorie diets, increasing obesity and lack of exercise, prolonged periods of artificial lighting, shift work, trans-meridian travel, jet lag, and disordered sleep, all have the potential to impair fertility .
Basal body temperature (defined as once-a-day temperature measurement at same time of day) charting has been used extensively as a simple aid for predicting ovulation . Standard practice is to measure BBT upon waking, but as this is a single time point and not the nadir of CBT, BBT data do not precisely capture changes in circadian temperature rhythms seen across the menstrual cycle. However, many currently available products and tracking tools require a considerable amount of user interaction to record frequent temperature readings, urine test results, and other observations. This can lead to frequent errors, user stress. and frustration [72, 73].
New wearable technologies are capable of recording core body temperature and wirelessly pair to smartphones allowing sophisticated analysis of continuous recording of body temperature [73, 74]. Other approaches have included shell or peripheral temperature measurement . While there are no head-to-head comparisons of devices employing these different approaches, it has been suggested that assessment of skin temperature may not be an accurate predictor of ovulation . For example, results obtained with a wrist temperature sensor indicated sustained 3-day temperature shift in only 82% of cycles and the lowest cycle temperature occurred in the fertile window 41% of the time. In addition, most temporal shifts (87%) occurred on ovulation day or later .
Over the last several decades, BBT has been used to identify the biphasic temperature change that verifies ovulation and that information has been applied to the next cycle assuming that each cycle is as regular as the first. Obviously, this does not account for individual variability in a woman’s menstrual cycle each month. Identifying the more subtle periovulatory infradian temperature nadir is fraught with the inaccuracy of a single once-a-day peripheral temperature measurement. More importantly, research does not support the use of the BBT nadir for predicting ovulation . Additionally, BBT is not able to make use of the information found in higher-frequency measurements of body temperature now being discovered.
CCBT can provide accurate and precise prediction of ovulation in addition to identifying the highest probability within the window of fertility . Additionally, true CCBT is collected night and day to catch changes that may occur at any time in a 24-hour period , including true mesor, and higher frequency components, as in ultradian rhythms. Temperatures obtained from an intravaginal device identical in form to intravaginal rings currently sold on the market provides a safe, continuous and accurate CBT as well as real-time access to sophisticated algorithms that can process an alert or notification to a smartphone. The convenience of no longer tracking a potentially unreliable peripheral temperature at the same time of early morning hours is evident.
Access to continuous CBT provides information not usually available to clinicians, but it is capable of predicting changes across menstrual cycles and classifying etiologies of infertility. CBT follows a distinct circadian rhythm and is also influenced by reproductive hormones which interact with hypothalamic neural circuits. Signal processing analyses applied to a precise, accurate and continuous CBT combined with new wearable technologies can accurately classify CBT changes for use in fertility awareness, infertility, silent anovulation, and a number of other health-related applications. The more immediate benefit of CBT is to help better define the window of fertility for the purposes of avoiding or promoting conception.
The authors acknowledge the assistance of Robert W Rhoades, PhD in the development of this manuscript.
Medical writing/editing support was funded by Prima-Temp, Inc. and may support the use of products produced by their company.
Dr Wade W. Webster is Chief Medical Officer and Founder, board member and stockholder of Prima-Temp Inc.
Dr Benjamin Smarr has a business and/or financial interest with Prima-Temp, Inc.
Grant AD, Wilsterman K, Smarr BL, Kriegsfeld LJ. Evidence for a Coupled Oscillator Model of Endocrine Ultradian Rhythms. J Biol Rhythms. 2018; 33: 475–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0748730418791423
Coyne MD, Kesick CM, Doherty TJ, Kolka MA, Stephenson LA. Circadian rhythm changes in core temperature over the menstrual cycle: method for noninvasive monitoring. American Journal of Physiology – Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology. 2000; 279: R1316–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.2000.279.4.R1316
Cagnacci A, Arangino S, Tuveri F, Paoletti AM, Volpe A. Regulation of the 24h body temperature rhythm of women in luteal phase: role of gonadal steroids and prostaglandins. Chronobiol Int. 2002; 19: 721–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/CBI-120005394
Aronson BD, Bell-Pedersen D, Block GD, Bos NP, Dunlap JC, Eskin A, et al. Circadian rhythms. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1993; 18: 315–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0173(93)90015-R
Beale AD, Whitmore D, Moran D. Life in a dark biosphere: a review of circadian physiology in “arrhythmic” environments. J Comp Physiol B, Biochem Syst Environ Physiol. 2016; 186: 947–68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00360-016-1000-6
Loudon ASI. Circadian biology: a 2.5 billion year old clock. Curr Biol. 2012; 22: R570–571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.023
Mohawk JA, Green CB, Takahashi JS. Central and peripheral circadian clocks in mammals. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2012; 35: 445–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-060909-153128
Takahashi JS. Transcriptional architecture of the mammalian circadian clock. Nat Rev Genet. 2017; 18: 164–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg.2016.150
Bedont JL, LeGates TA, Buhr E, Bathini A, Ling JP, Bell B, et al. An LHX1-Regulated Transcriptional Network Controls Sleep/Wake Coupling and Thermal Resistance of the Central Circadian Clockworks. Curr Biol. 2017; 27: 128–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.008
Golombek DA, Rosenstein RE. Physiology of circadian entrainment. Physiol Rev. 2010; 90: 1063–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00009.2009
Welsh DK, Takahashi JS, Kay SA. Suprachiasmatic nucleus: cell autonomy and network properties. Annu Rev Physiol. 2010; 72: 551–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-021909-135919
Hastings MH, Maywood ES, Brancaccio M. Generation of circadian rhythms in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2018; 19: 453–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-018-0026-z
Evans MC, Anderson GM. Integration of Circadian and Metabolic Control of Reproductive Function. Endocrinology. 2018; 159: 3661–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2018-00691
Refinetti R. Comparison of light, food, and temperature as environmental synchronizers of the circadian rhythm of activity in mice. J Physiol Sci. 2015; 65: 359–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12576-015-0374-7
Buhr ED, Yoo S-H, Takahashi JS. Temperature as a universal resetting cue for mammalian circadian oscillators. Science. 2010; 330: 379–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1195262
Ruby NF, Burns DE, Heller HC. Circadian Rhythms in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus are Temperature-Compensated and Phase-Shifted by Heat Pulses In Vitro. J Neurosci. 1999; 19: 8630–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-19-08630.1999
Brown SA, Zumbrunn G, Fleury-Olela F, Preitner N, Schibler U. Rhythms of mammalian body temperature can sustain peripheral circadian clocks. Curr Biol. 2002; 12: 1574–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01145-4
Guo H, Brewer JM, Champhekar A, Harris RBS, Bittman EL. Differential control of peripheral circadian rhythms by suprachiasmatic-dependent neural signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005; 102: 3111–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0409734102
Silver R, LeSauter J, Tresco PA, Lehman MN. A diffusible coupling signal from the transplanted suprachiasmatic nucleus controlling circadian locomotor rhythms. Nature. 1996; 382: 810–3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/382810a0
Thomas JM, Kern PA, Bush HM, McQuerry KJ, Black WS, Clasey JL, et al. Circadian rhythm phase shifts caused by timed exercise vary with chronotype. JCI Insight. 2020; 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.134270
Cermakian N, Westfall S, Kiessling S. Circadian Clocks and Inflammation: Reciprocal Regulation and Shared Mediators. Arch Immunol Ther Exp. 2014; 62: 303–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005-014-0286-x
Ono D, Honma K, Honma S. Circadian and ultradian rhythms of clock gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of freely moving mice. Scientific Reports. 2015; 5: 12310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12310
Bailey M, Silver R. Sex differences in circadian timing systems: implications for disease. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014; 35: 111–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2013.11.003
Fatehi M, Fatehi-Hassanabad Z. Effects of 17beta-estradiol on neuronal cell excitability and neurotransmission in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of rat. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008; 33: 1354–64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1301523
Yan L, Silver R. Neuroendocrine underpinnings of sex differences in circadian timing systems. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.10.007
Karatsoreos IN, Silver R. Minireview: The Neuroendocrinology of the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus as a Conductor of Body Time in Mammals. Endocrinology. 2007; 148: 5640–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2007-1083
Kräuchi K. How is the circadian rhythm of core body temperature regulated? Clin Auton Res. 2002; 12: 147–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-002-0043-9
Tansey EA, Johnson CD. Recent advances in thermoregulation. Adv Physiol Educ. 2015; 39: 139–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00126.2014
Saini C, Morf J, Stratmann M, Gos P, Schibler U. Simulated body temperature rhythms reveal the phase-shifting behavior and plasticity of mammalian circadian oscillators. Genes Dev. 2012; 26: 567–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.183251.111
Husse J, Eichele G, Oster H. Synchronization of the mammalian circadian timing system: Light can control peripheral clocks independently of the SCN clock: alternate routes of entrainment optimize the alignment of the body’s circadian clock network with external time. Bioessays. 2015; 37: 1119–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201500026
Brown EN, Choe Y, Luithardt H, Czeisler CA. A statistical model of the human core-temperature circadian rhythm. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2000; 279: E669–683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.2000.279.3.E669
Khalsa SBS null, Jewett ME, Duffy JF, Czeisler CA. The timing of the human circadian clock is accurately represented by the core body temperature rhythm following phase shifts to a three-cycle light stimulus near the critical zone. J Biol Rhythms. 2000; 15: 524–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/074873040001500609
Czeisler CA, Gooley JJ. Sleep and circadian rhythms in humans. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2007; 72: 579–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2007.72.064
Roenneberg T, Kuehnle T, Juda M, Kantermann T, Allebrandt K, Gordijn M, et al. Epidemiology of the human circadian clock. Sleep Med Rev. 2007; 11: 429–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2007.07.005
Kalmbach DA, Schneider LD, Cheung J, Bertrand SJ, Kariharan T, Pack AI, et al. Genetic Basis of Chronotype in Humans: Insights From Three Landmark GWAS. Sleep. 2017; 40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsw048
Jones SE, Lane JM, Wood AR, van Hees VT, Tyrrell J, Beaumont RN, et al. Genome-wide association analyses of chronotype in 697,828 individuals provides insights into circadian rhythms. Nat Commun. 2019; 10: 343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08259-7
Khan S, Nabi G, Yao L, Siddique R, Sajjad W, Kumar S, et al. Health risks associated with genetic alterations in internal clock system by external factors. Int J Biol Sci. 2018; 14: 791–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.23744
Molzof HE, Prapanjaroensin A, Patel VH, Mokashi MV, Gamble KL, Patrician PA. Misaligned core body temperature rhythms impact cognitive performance of hospital shift work nurses. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2019; 160: 151–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2019.01.002
Christian CA, Moenter SM. The neurobiology of preovulatory and estradiol-induced gonadotropin-releasing hormone surges. Endocr Rev. 2010; 31: 544–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2009-0023
Miller BH, Takahashi JS. Central Circadian Control of Female Reproductive Function. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014; 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2013.00195
Olcese J. Circadian aspects of mammalian parturition: a review. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2011; 349: 62–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2011.06.041
Cahill DJ, Wardle PG, Harlow CR, Hull MG. Onset of the preovulatory luteinizing hormone surge: diurnal timing and critical follicular prerequisites. Fertil Steril. 1998; 70: 56–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00113-7
Mahoney MM. Shift Work, Jet Lag, and Female Reproduction. International Journal of Endocrinology. 2010; 2010: e813764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/813764
Park SJ, Goldsmith LT, Skurnick JH, Wojtczuk A, Weiss G. Characteristics of the urinary luteinizing hormone surge in young ovulatory women. Fertil Steril. 2007; 88: 684–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.045
Infertility Workup for the Women’s Health Specialist. n.d. https://www.acog.org/en/Clinical/Clinical Guidance/Committee Opinion/Articles/2019/06/Infertility Workup for the Womens Health Specialist (accessed August 4, 2020).
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Adolescence, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Adolescent Health Care, Diaz A, Laufer MR, Breech LL. Menstruation in girls and adolescents: using the menstrual cycle as a vital sign. Pediatrics. 2006; 118: 2245–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-2481
Harris HR, Titus LJ, Cramer DW, Terry KL. Long and irregular menstrual cycles, polycystic ovary syndrome, and ovarian cancer risk in a population-based case-control study. Int J Cancer. 2017; 140: 285–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.30441
Baker FC, Driver HS. Circadian rhythms, sleep, and the menstrual cycle. Sleep Medicine. 2007; 8: 613–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2006.09.011
Lawson CC, Whelan EA, Lividoti Hibert EN, Spiegelman D, Schernhammer ES, Rich-Edwards JW. Rotating shift work and menstrual cycle characteristics. Epidemiology. 2011; 22: 305–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182130016
Kovanen L, Saarikoski ST, Aromaa A, Lönnqvist J, Partonen T. ARNTL (BMAL1) and NPAS2 Gene Variants Contribute to Fertility and Seasonality. PLoS One. 2010; 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010007
Cagnacci A, Soldani R, Laughlin GA, Yen SS. Modification of circadian body temperature rhythm during the luteal menstrual phase: role of melatonin. J Appl Physiol. 1996; 80: 25–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1918.104.22.168
Williams WP, Kriegsfeld LJ. Circadian control of neuroendocrine circuits regulating female reproductive function. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2012; 3: 60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2012.00060
Webster W, Godfrey EM, Costantini L, Katilius J. Passive fertility prediction using a novel vaginal ring and smartphone application. Fertility and Sterility. 2015; 104: e98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.303
Smarr BL, Gile JJ, de la Iglesia HO. Oestrogen-independent circadian clock gene expression in the anteroventral periventricular nucleus in female rats: possible role as an integrator for circadian and ovarian signals timing the luteinising hormone surge. J Neuroendocrinol. 2013; 25: 1273–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jne.12104
Costa JBG, Ahola JK, Weller ZD, Peel RK, Whittier JC, Barcellos JOJ. Reticulo-rumen temperature as a predictor of calving time in primiparous and parous Holstein females. Journal of Dairy Science. 2016; 99: 4839–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-9289
Buxton CL, Atkinson WB. Hormonal factors involved in the regulation of basal body temperature during the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1948; 8: 544–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-8-7-544
Smarr BL, Zucker I, Kriegsfeld LJ. Detection of Successful and Unsuccessful Pregnancies in Mice within Hours of Pairing through Frequency Analysis of High Temporal Resolution Core Body Temperature Data. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11: e0160127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160127
Stephenson LA, Kolka MA. Esophageal temperature threshold for sweating decreases before ovulation in premenopausal women. J Appl Physiol. 1999; 86: 22–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1922.214.171.124
Silva NL, Boulant JA. Effects of testosterone, estradiol, and temperature on neurons in preoptic tissue slices. Am J Physiol. 1986; 250: R625–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1986.250.4.R625
Nakayama T, Suzuki M, Ishizuka N. Action of progesterone on preoptic thermosensitive neurones. Nature. 1975; 258: 80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/258080a0
Pinkerton JV. Hormone Therapy for Postmenopausal Women. N Engl J Med. 2020; 382: 446–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp1714787
Charkoudian N, Stachenfeld N. Sex hormone effects on autonomic mechanisms of thermoregulation in humans. Auton Neurosci. 2016; 196: 75–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2015.11.004
Stachenfeld NS, Silva C, Keefe DL. Estrogen modifies the temperature effects of progesterone. J Appl Physiol. 2000; 88: 1643–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.88.5.1643
Bedford JL, Prior JC, Hitchcock CL, Barr SI. Detecting evidence of luteal activity by least-squares quantitative basal temperature analysis against urinary progesterone metabolites and the effect of wake-time variability. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2009; 146: 76–80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.05.001
Prior JC, Naess M, Langhammer A, Forsmo S. Ovulation Prevalence in Women with Spontaneous Normal-Length Menstrual Cycles – A Population-Based Cohort from HUNT3, Norway. PLOS ONE. 2015; 10: e0134473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134473
Prior JC, Vigna YM, Schechter MT, Burgess AE. Spinal bone loss and ovulatory disturbances. N Engl J Med. 1990; 323: 1221–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199011013231801
Prior JC. Progesterone Within Ovulatory Menstrual Cycles Needed for Cardiovascular Protection: An Evidence-Based Hypothesis. 1 2014; 3: 85–103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14200/jrm.2014.3.0106
Grattarola R. The premenstrual endometrial pattern of women with breast cancer. A study of progestational activity. Cancer. 1964; 17: 1119–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(196409)17:9<1119::AID-CNCR2820170904>3.0.CO;2-1
Xu W-H, Xiang Y-B, Ruan Z-X, Zheng W, Cheng J-R, Dai Q, et al. Menstrual and reproductive factors and endometrial cancer risk: Results from a population-based case-control study in urban Shanghai. Int J Cancer. 2004; 108: 613–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11598
Su H, Yi Y, Wei T, Chang T, Cheng C. Detection of ovulation, a review of currently available methods. Bioeng Transl Med. 2017; 2: 238–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10058
Regidor P-A, Kaczmarczyk M, Schiweck E, Goeckenjan-Festag M, Alexander H. Identification and prediction of the fertile window with a new web-based medical device using a vaginal biosensor for measuring the circadian and circamensual core body temperature. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018; 34: 256–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2017.1390737
Aptekar D, Costantini L, Katilius J, Webster W. Continuous, Passive Personal Wearable Sensor to Predict Ovulation [21G]. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016; 127: 64S. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000483905.29999.b1
Owen M. Physiological Signs of Ovulation and Fertility Readily Observable by Women. Linacre Q. 2013; 80: 17–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/0024363912Z.0000000005
Shilaih M, Goodale BM, Falco L, Kübler F, De Clerck V, Leeners B. Modern fertility awareness methods: wrist wearables capture the changes in temperature associated with the menstrual cycle. Biosci Rep. 2018; 38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20171279
Barron ML, Fehring RJ. Basal body temperature assessment: is it useful to couples seeking pregnancy? MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2005; 30: 290–6; quiz 297–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005721-200509000-00004
Shechter A, Varin F, Boivin DB. Circadian Variation of Sleep During the Follicular and Luteal Phases of the Menstrual Cycle. Sleep. 2010; 33: 647–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/33.5.647